first_img Reporters Without Borders is worried by recent court rulings requested by candidates that have curbed press coverage of the election campaign two days before the second round on 29 October. The organisation says the electoral law is incompatible with appropriate press coverage of the campaign. News Organisation April 27, 2021 Find out more to go further RSF begins research into mechanisms for protecting journalists in Latin America April 15, 2021 Find out more BrazilAmericas May 13, 2021 Find out more RSF_en Follow the news on Brazil Reports 2011-2020: A study of journalist murders in Latin America confirms the importance of strengthening protection policies BrazilAmericas News Alarm after two journalists murdered in Brazil Help by sharing this information October 27, 2006 – Updated on January 20, 2016 Courts curb press coverage of elections on eve of second round News Receive email alerts On the eve of the second round of Brazil’s general elections on 29 October, Reporters Without Borders today voiced concern about recent judicial rulings curbing press coverage of the campaign. On 19 October, the federal Superior Electoral Court (TSE) fined CBN radio for “electoral propaganda” and ordered it to censor its website. On 25 October, the Regional Electoral Court (TRE) in the southern state of Paraná banned the media from reporting on a police raid at the request of a gubernatorial candidate.“These judicial decisions reflect a very strange idea of the role of the press, which is obviously supposed to be a forum for political debate but which also entitled to take a position,” Reporters Without Borders said. “By banning all propaganda during election campaigns, the electoral law seems to be out of tune with media coverage of politics.”The press freedom organisation added: “A media’s editorial position often entails a preference for a particular candidate, but the TSE’s ruling exaggeratedly assumes that every reader or listener will follow it. This attributes much more power to the press than it in fact has. As for the ruling issued by the Paraná TRE at the request of gubernatorial candidate Osmar Dias, it does not really serve his electoral interests. Does he think he will be protected by preventive censorship? This kind of censorship belongs to the past.”The TSE fined CBN 10,000 dollars on 19 October after one of its commentators, Arnaldo Jabor, expressed an opinion that was deemed overly favourable to opposition presidential candidate Geraldo Alckmin. Acting in response to a complaint by President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s reelection campaign, the TSE also ordered CBN to withdraw the comment from its website, ruling that it had violated an electoral law ban on all propaganda during the election campaign (which officially began on 1 July).In response to Dias’ complaint, the Paraná TRE fine the Hora H News website on 25 October for publishing information about the seizure by the police of a trunk full of banknotes from a hotel in the state capital of Curitiba two days earlier. Judge Renato Lopes de Paiva ruled that the report was liable to “prejudice” Dias, who is tipped by the polls to lose.Citing “judicial confidentiality,” the judge rounded off his ruling with a ban on all media coverage of the police raid. Journalists’ unions have contested the ruling, claiming that it violates the federal constitutional right of access to information.last_img